top of page
Different types of Hyperbaric chambers, chapter 3

Chapter 3

Types of Hyperbaric Chambers

Monoplace Chambers

Description and Features

Monoplace chambers are designed to accommodate a single patient at a time. These cylindrical chambers are typically made of clear acrylic, allowing the patient to see outside and medical staff to monitor the patient easily. Key features include:

  • Size: Usually about 7 feet long and 3 feet in diameter

  • Pressurization: The entire chamber is filled with 100% oxygen

  • Operation: Controlled from an external console by a trained technician

Monoplace Hyperbaric Oxygen Chamber

Advantages

  1. Privacy and comfort for individual patients

  2. Direct exposure to 100% oxygen without the need for a mask or hood

  3. Easier to install and maintain due to smaller size

  4. Lower operational costs compared to multiplace chambers

Limitations

  1. Limited space for medical interventions during treatment

  2. May not be suitable for claustrophobic patients

  3. Cannot accommodate medical staff inside the chamber during treatment

Typical Uses

Monoplace chambers are commonly used for:

  • Wound healing

  • Radiation tissue damage treatment

  • Carbon monoxide poisoning

  • Certain infections

Multiplace Hyperbaric Oxygen Chamber with 8 seats

Multiplace Chambers

Description and Features

Multiplace chambers are larger units designed to accommodate multiple patients simultaneously. These chambers are typically constructed of steel and resemble a small room or submarine. Key features include:

  • Size: Can vary, but typically large enough for 2-14 patients

  • Pressurization: The chamber is filled with compressed air, and patients breathe 100% oxygen through masks or hoods

  • Operation: A trained inside attendant is present during treatments

Advantages

  1. Can treat multiple patients simultaneously

  2. Allows for medical staff to be present inside the chamber

  3. More spacious, reducing claustrophobia concerns

  4. Enables complex medical interventions during treatment if necessary

Limitations

  1. Higher initial and operational costs

  2. Requires more space for installation

  3. More complex to operate and maintain

Typical Uses

Multiplace chambers are often used for:

  • Critical care patients requiring constant monitoring

  • Patients needing physical assistance during treatment

  • Group therapy sessions

  • Training of medical personnel in hyperbaric medicine

Mild Hyperbaric
 Chambers

Description and Features

Mild hyperbaric chambers, also known as low-pressure hyperbaric chambers, are a newer addition to the HBOT landscape. These chambers operate at lower pressures compared to traditional hyperbaric chambers. Key features include:

  • Pressure: Typically 1.3 to 1.5 atmospheres absolute (ATA)

  • Construction: Often made of soft, flexible materials

  • Oxygen concentration: Uses ambient air or slightly enriched oxygen (up to 24%)

  • Portability: Many models are designed for home use

Picture of a Mild Hyperbaric Oxygen Chamber

Advantages

  1. More affordable and accessible for home use

  2. Easier to operate and maintain

  3. Lower risk of oxygen toxicity due to lower pressure and oxygen concentration

  4. Can be used more frequently than traditional HBOT

Limitations

  1. Lower pressure means less dramatic increase in oxygen levels

  2. Not suitable for treating conditions that require higher pressures

  3. Limited scientific evidence for efficacy compared to traditional HBOT

  4. Not approved by FDA for medical treatment​

Typical Uses

Mild hyperbaric chambers are often used for:

  • Athletic recovery

  • Wellness and anti-aging therapies

  • Complementary treatment for various chronic conditions

  • Altitude sickness prevention

Comparison of

Chamber Types

Chamber Table Comparison.png

Choosing the Right Chamber for Treatment

The choice of hyperbaric chamber depends on several factors:

  1. Medical condition and treatment goals

  2. Prescribed pressure and oxygen levels

  3. Need for medical supervision during treatment

  4. Budget and accessibility considerations

  5. Patient comfort and preferences

Healthcare providers should carefully consider these factors when recommending a type of hyperbaric chamber for treatment.

Future Trends in Hyperbaric Chamber Design

The field of hyperbaric chamber design continues to evolve:

  1. Enhanced patient comfort features across all chamber types

  2. Integration of advanced monitoring systems

  3. Development of portable units for emergency and military use

  4. Improved energy efficiency and environmental sustainability

  5. Research into the efficacy of mild chambers for various conditions

As technology advances, we can expect to see hyperbaric chambers that offer even greater safety, comfort, and treatment efficacy.

HBOT Chamber Design

Conclusion

Understanding the differences between monoplace, multiplace, and mild hyperbaric chambers is crucial for both patients and healthcare providers. Each type has its unique advantages and limitations, and the choice depends on various factors including medical needs, facility capabilities, and patient preferences. As HBOT continues to gain recognition for its therapeutic benefits, ongoing advancements in chamber design will further enhance the treatment experience and outcomes for patients across all chamber types.

CONTACT

US

Tel: 2513 9992 | 2513 9993

A.M.L. 28A Shum Wan Road, Wong Chuk Hang, Hong Kong​

VISIT

US

Monday - Friday 9:00 - 18:00

Sat - Sun Closed

(Unless emergency)

TELL

US

Thanks for submitting!

References

  1. Mathieu, D., Marroni, A., & Kot, J. (2017). Tenth European Consensus Conference on Hyperbaric Medicine: recommendations for accepted and non-accepted clinical indications and practice of hyperbaric oxygen treatment. Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine, 47(1), 24-32.

  2. Weaver, L. K. (2014). Hyperbaric oxygen therapy indications. 13th ed. North Palm Beach, FL: Best Publishing Company.

  3. Jain, K. K. (2016). Textbook of Hyperbaric Medicine. 6th ed. Springer International Publishing.

  4. Gesell, L. B. (2008). Hyperbaric oxygen therapy indications. 12th ed. Durham, NC: Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society.

  5. Thom, S. R. (2011). Hyperbaric oxygen: its mechanisms and efficacy. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 127(Suppl 1), 131S-141S.

  6. Fife, C. E., Eckert, K. A., & Carter, M. J. (2016). An update on the appropriate role for hyperbaric oxygen: indications and evidence. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 138(3S), 107S-116S.

  7. Heyboer III, M., Sharma, D., Santiago, W., & McCulloch, N. (2017). Hyperbaric oxygen therapy: side effects defined and quantified. Advances in Wound Care, 6(6), 210-224.

  8. Kot, J., & Mathieu, D. (2011). Controversial issues in hyperbaric oxygen therapy: a European Committee for Hyperbaric Medicine Workshop. Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine, 41(2), 101-104.

  9. Camporesi, E. M., & Bosco, G. (2014). Mechanisms of action of hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Undersea & Hyperbaric Medicine, 41(3), 247-252.

  10. Leach, R. M., Rees, P. J., & Wilmshurst, P. (1998). Hyperbaric oxygen therapy. BMJ, 317(7166), 1140-1143.

  11. Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society. (2014). Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Indications. 13th Edition. Best Publishing Company.

  12. Neuman, T. S., & Thom, S. R. (2008). Physiology and medicine of hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Elsevier Health Sciences.

  13. Gill, A. L., & Bell, C. N. (2004). Hyperbaric oxygen: its uses, mechanisms of action and outcomes. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, 97(7), 385-395.

  14. Tibbles, P. M., & Edelsberg, J. S. (1996). Hyperbaric-oxygen therapy. New England Journal of Medicine, 334(25), 1642-1648.

  15. Thom, S. R. (2009). Oxidative stress is fundamental to hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Journal of Applied Physiology, 106(3), 988-995.

©Copyright 2024  Asia Hyperbaric Centre Limited

All rights reserved | Privacy Policy

All certifications and images displayed on this website are for illustrative purposes only and do not represent actual certifications issued to any individual or entity. In case of any discrepancy between the English version and other language versions of this disclaimer, the English version shall prevail.

bottom of page